近50年北洛河流域生态系统服务时空演变特征与权衡/协同关系
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

X826

基金项目:

中欧典型农业系统退化土壤修复管理创新研究平台(2022YFE0115300)、国家自然科学基金项目(41877083)


Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Trade-offs/Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Beiluo River Basin in the Last 50 Years
Author:
Affiliation:

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,Northwest A F University,Yangling,Shaanxi

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]探究北洛河流域生态系统服务时空演变特征与权衡/协同关系,为该区资源的合理配置和可持续发展提供科学依据。[方法]基于1970-2020年6期土地利用/覆被数据、气象数据、土壤数据、数字高程模型(DEM)等多源数据,运用InVEST 和CSLE等模型,定量评估分析北洛河流域1970-1990年土地利用相对稳定期、2000年左右的过渡期和2010-2020年的生态恢复的不同时期内产水量、土壤保持和碳储量三种典型关键生态系统服务的时空变化特征及其权衡/协同关系。[结果] (1)流域总产水量表现出先增加后波动下降的趋势,2000年代降至最低。土地利用稳定期产水总量的年代际均值为10.16×108m3(37.75mm),过渡期降低了36.9%,而生态恢复期降低了25.53%。林、耕、草三种土地利用类型中,耕地产水总量和产水深始终最大,林地的产水深始终最小。(2)土壤保持总量整体呈波动增加趋势,2010年代达到最高值。土地利用稳定期内,土壤保持总量的年代际均值为305.62×106 t(113.57t/hm2),过渡期上升至364.52×106 t,生态恢复期显著增加至426.19×106 t(157.75t/hm2),相较于第一时期增加了38.9%。林地保持能力远高于耕地,梯田等工程措施的建设使耕地土壤保持功能大幅提升。(3)碳储总量呈先稳定后持续增加趋势,2000年代后开始显著增长,2020年代较1970年代增长了24.09%。林地是主要的碳库,其碳储量显著增加,而草地和耕地碳储量随面积减少而降低。(4)在空间格局变化上,产水量减少、土壤保持和碳储量增加的地区主要集中在高塬沟壑区和丘陵沟壑区。(5)在流域尺度上,1970-2020年间北洛河流域产水量与土壤保持、碳储量之间存在权衡关系,土壤保持与碳储量则呈协同关系。土壤保持与碳储量的协同度随时间降低,而产水量与其他两者的权衡关系相对稳定。[结论]随着植被恢复,流域产水,土壤保持和碳储量等生态系统服务功能具有明显的时间和空间变化特征,具有相对稳定的权衡协同关系,研究结果可为黄土高原生态系统服务综合效益的提升提供科学的依据。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] This study aims to investigate the spatiotemporal evolutionary traits and the trade-offs/synergies of ecosystem services within the Beiluo River Basin, thereby offering a scientific foundation for the judicious allocation of resources and the pursuit of sustainable development in the area. [Methods] Utilizing a suite of multi-source data, including land use/cover datasets, meteorological records, soil information, and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) spanning from 1970 to 2020, we employed models such as InVEST and CSLE to quantitatively evaluate and dissect the spatiotemporal dynamics of three pivotal ecosystem services: water yield, soil conservation, and carbon sequestration, while also examining their interplay through trade-offs and synergies. [Results] (1) The basin's overall water yield trended upwards initially, followed by fluctuations and eventual decline, bottoming out in the 2000s. During the phase of stable land use, the average water yield across decades was 10.16×108 m3 (corresponding to a water yield depth of 37.75 mm). This figure saw a 36.9% drop during the transitional period and a further 25.53% decrease during the ecological restoration phase compared to the initial period. Among the three land use types—forest, cropland, and grassland—cropland consistently yielded the highest volume of water, while forest land consistently had the lowest water yield depth. (2) The basin's total soil retention displayed an upward trend with fluctuations, reaching its zenith in the 2010s. Over the stable land use period, the average annual soil conservation was 305.62×106 t (equating to a conservation rate of 113.57t/hm2). This figure surged to 364.52×106 t in the transition period and significantly increased to 426.19×106 t during the ecological restoration period (with a retention rate of 157.75 t/hm2), marking a 38.9% rise from the first period. The soil conservation capacity of forest land significantly outperforms that of cropland, and the implementation of conservation measures such as terracing has substantially enhanced the soil conservation capabilities of cropland. (3) The total carbon storage maintained stability before embarking on a continuous climb, with a notable acceleration in growth from the 2000s onwards. When compared to the 1970s, carbon storage in the 2020s has seen a 24.09% increase. Forest land serves as the primary carbon repository, with a substantial uptick in its storage capacity. Conversely, the carbon storage in grassland and cropland has diminished in line with their shrinking areas, while the carbon storage in urbanized areas has increased as cities have expanded. (4) In terms of spatial pattern changes, the regions where water yield has decreased, and soil retention and carbon storage have increased, are primarily concentrated in the high plateau and gully areas, as well as the hilly and gully regions. (5) At the basin scale, there was a trade-off between water yield and soil retention, as well as carbon storage in the Beiluo River Basin from 1970 to 2020. Soil retention and carbon storage, however, exhibited a synergistic relationship. The degree of synergy between soil retention and carbon storage decreased over time, while the trade-off relationship between water yield and the other two factors remained relatively stable. [Conclusion] The restoration of vegetation has imparted distinct temporal and spatial characteristics to the ecosystem services of water yield, soil conservation, and carbon storage within the basin, which exhibit relatively stable trade-off and synergistic relationships. These findings offer a scientific underpinning for enhancing the comprehensive benefits of ecosystem services on the Loess Plateau.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-17
  • 最后修改日期:2024-11-13
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-02-21
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码