绿肥间作对渭北果园土壤水分、养分及苹果产量的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.西北农林科技大学水利与建筑工程学院;2.西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院;3.中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Effects of green manure intercropping on soil moisture, nutrients, and apple yield in a Weibei apple orchard
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&2.F University;3.College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering, Northwest A&

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 研究渭北苹果园不同种类绿肥间作及其结合地布覆盖在土壤蓄水保墒、养分供给以及果实产量提升方面的效应。[方法] 设置黑麦草(R),油菜(O),苜蓿(A)3种绿肥,不覆地布(NG),覆盖地布(G)2种方式,清耕为对照(CK)。不覆地布+绿肥间作为主处理,覆盖地布+绿肥间作为副处理。于主处理及对照各小区分别设置15N田间示踪微区。探究苹果-绿肥间作系统土壤水分、养分及果实产量的响应。[结果] 各处理土壤质量含水量均低于CK处理,GR处理下降幅度最小(1.7%)。主处理土壤水分差异率均为负值,其中NGR处理绝对值最低(0.5%),NGA处理最高(4.7%)。各处理作物蒸散量均大于CK,其中GR处理增幅最小(0.3%)。各处理0~60 cm硝态氮含量平均值均低于CK。与副处理相比,主处理硝态氮及铵态氮含量平均提升6.8%和5.4%。间作绿肥(NGR、NGO、NGA)平均减少了56.4%的15N损失(p < 0.05),苜蓿15N利用率最高(39.4%),黑麦草最低(19.7%)。与CK处理相比,黑麦草间作处理(NGR、GR)土壤有机质与全氮含量平均提升1.5%和0.2%,而苜蓿间作处理则分别降低15.2%和15.4%。黑麦草间作处理(NGR、GR)的果实产量与水分利用效率最高,分别较CK处理提升12.1%和8.8%(p < 0.05)。[结论] 综合考虑,在渭北苹果园内采用树下覆地布+行间间作黑麦草(GR)的二元覆盖模式有助于减少土壤水分消耗与养分损失,增加果实产量和水分利用效率。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] We conducted a field experiment to investigate the effects of intercropping green manure crops and their combination with ground fabric mulching on soil moisture, fertility, and apple yield. [Methods] Main treatments including intercropping ryegrass (NGR), oilseed rape (NGO), and alfalfa (NGA), sub-treatments including combined these with mulching ground fabric under trees (GR/GO/GA), and the control treatment is traditional clean tillage (CK) were designed. Additionally, 15N microplots were set up within main and control treatments. The responses of soil moisture, nutrients, and fruit yield were explored under the apple-green manure intercropping system. [Results] All treatments reduced soil water content (SWC) in which the decreasing range of GR (1.7%) was the smallest, relative to CK. Soil water difference ratio (SWDR) in main treatments were all negative, in which NGR had the smallest absolute value (0.5%) and NGA had the biggest (4.7%). All treatments increased evapotranspiration (ET), in which the increasing range of GR (0.3%) was the smallest, relative to CK. All treatments reduced the soil nitrate nitrogen (SNN) content, relative to CK. Compared to sub-treatments, the SNN and soil ammonium nitrogen (SAN) contents in main treatments averagely increased by 6.8% and 5.4%. Intercropping green manure (NGR, NGO, NGA) reduced 15N loss by an average of 56.4% (p < 0.05), relative to CK, with alfalfa showing the highest 15N utilization efficiency (39.4%) and ryegrass showing the lowest (19.7%). Compared to CK, ryegrass intercropping treatments (NGR, GR) increased SOM and TN contents by an average of 1.5% and 0.2%, respectively. In contrast, alfalfa (NGA, GA) intercropping treatments decreased by 15.2% and 15.4%, relative to CK. Ryegrass intercropping treatments (NGR, GR) showed the highest fruit yield and water use efficiency, with average increases of 12.1% in yield and 8.8% in water use efficiency, relative to CK (p < 0.05). [Conclusion] In conclusion, adopting the binary mulching pattern (ground fabric mulching under trees + ryegrass intercropping in inter-row) was beneficial to decreasing water consumption, nutrient loss, and increasing fruit yield and water use efficiency.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-07
  • 最后修改日期:2024-12-04
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-02-21
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码