峰丛洼地石漠化区乡村聚落的形态学特征及空间演变规律
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

西南林业大学水土保持学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

K901.8

基金项目:

“岩溶地区聚落空间格局与石漠生态系统演变耦合关系研究”(32260420); 云南省科技厅计划项目“光伏太阳能利用模式对石漠生态系统碳汇影响效应及其调控策略”(202401AS070014)第一作者:林广(1996—),男,在读硕士,主要从事石漠化治理修复与水土保持研究。E-mail:304059155@qq.com通讯作者:王妍(1980—),女,博士,教授,主要从事脆弱生态系统关键过程与修复、土地利用及景观动态演变等研究。E-mail:wycaf@126.com ,2


Morphological Characteristics and Spatial Evolution Laws of rural settlements at Peak-cruster Depressions in Rocky Desertification Areas
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Soil and Water Conservation,Southwest Forestry University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]为探究峰丛洼地石漠化区乡村聚落的形态学特征及空间演变规律,对乡村聚落空间布局优化及推进城乡统筹可持续发展具有重要意义。[方法]基于PLUS模型预测2035年经济发展情景、自然发展情景和生态保护情景下的乡村聚落分布,利用形态学空间分析(MSPA)方法识别乡村聚落的形态学特征,采用景观格局指数、景观综合动态度和Ripley K函数方法,实现对乡村聚落过去—现在—未来的形态学特征及空间演变规律分析。[结果](1)1990—2022年乡村聚落面积呈现上升趋势,面积增加6.09km2,数量由366增加至1253。核心与边缘是研究区内的优势乡村聚落类型,其面积分别增加1.90km21.51km2,主要分布在研究区中部,孤岛和分支等主要分布在北部和东北部,其面积增加1.07km21.15km2(2)乡村聚落类型的复杂性,丰富程度和破碎化程度整体上呈现增加的趋势;乡村聚落类型1990—2000年发育最为平缓,2010—2022年发育最为剧烈,乡村聚落类型扩张主要发生在兴街村和老街村及周边地区;乡村聚落类型在研究尺度内都表现出集聚趋势,随着空间尺度的增加乡村聚落空间分布的聚集特征减弱且城镇化过程空间尺度缩小。(3)3种情景下,乡村聚落面积均呈上升趋势,其面积分别为11.42km27.68km29.14km2核心是研究区内绝对优势类型,其面积分别增加4.02km22.60km23.14km2,乡村聚落类型在空间尺度上呈现集聚分布,并且生态保护情景会抑制乡村聚落的扩张。[结论]研究区乡村聚落处于快速发展阶段,乡村聚落的扩张主要表现在核心扩张上,而孤岛的扩张则是加剧了乡村聚落空间分布的复杂性,并且城镇化过程中乡村聚落逐渐聚集在较小的空间尺度。

    Abstract:

    [Objective]In order to explore the morphological characteristics and spatial evolution patterns of rural settlements in the rocky desertification area of the Peak Tree Depression, it is of great significance for the optimisation of the spatial layout of the rural settlements and the promotion of the urban-rural integration and sustainable development.[Methods] Based on the PLUS model, we predicted the distribution of rural settlements under the economic development scenario, natural development scenario and ecological protection scenario in 2035, identified the morphological features of rural settlements using the morphological spatial analysis (MSPA) method, and adopted the landscape pattern index, landscape integrated dynamic attitude and Ripley"s K-function method to realise the analysis of the morphological features and spatial evolution patterns of rural settlements in the past-now-future. The morphological characteristics and spatial evolution patterns of rural settlements in the past, present and future were analysed. [Results] (1) The area of rural settlements showed an upward trend from 1990 to 2022, with an increase of 6.09km2 in area and an increase in the number from 366 to 1253. The core and the edge are the dominant rural settlement types in the study area, with an increase in their areas of 1.90km2 and 1.51km2 respectively, which are mainly located in the central part of the study area, and the islands and branches are mainly located in the northern and northeastern parts of the study area. distributed in the northern and north-eastern parts of the study area and their areas increased by 1.07km2and 1.15km2 respectively.(2) The complexity, richness and fragmentation of rural settlement types show an overall increasing trend; the development of rural settlement types is the most gentle in 1990-2000, and the development is the most drastic in 2010-2022, and the expansion of rural settlement types mainly occurs in Xingjie and Laojie villages and the surrounding areas; rural settlement types show a tendency of agglomeration in the study scale. The rural settlement types show a tendency of agglomeration in the study scale, and with the increase of the spatial scale, the aggregation characteristics of the spatial distribution of rural settlements are weakened and the spatial scale of the urbanisation process is narrowed.(3) Under all three scenarios, the area of rural settlements shows an upward trend, and its area is 11.42km2, 7.68km2 and 9.14km2 respectively; the core is the absolutely dominant type in the study area, and its area increases by 4.02km2, 2.60km2 and 3.14km2 respectively, and the types of rural settlements show a clustered distribution on the spatial scale, and the ecological protection scenario will inhibit the rural The ecological protection scenario will inhibit the expansion of rural settlements.[Conclusion] Rural settlements in the study area are in the stage of rapid development, and the expansion of rural settlements is mainly manifested in the core expansion, while the expansion of isolated islands is exacerbating the complexity of the spatial distribution of rural settlements, and the process of urbanisation has gradually aggregated rural settlements in a smaller spatial scale.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-09
  • 最后修改日期:2024-09-02
  • 录用日期:2024-09-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-01-09
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码