自然降雨下紫色土坡耕地碳源添加对碳迁移及固碳的影响机制
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.河北建筑工程学院市政与环境工程系;2.中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所;3.四川省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S157.1

基金项目:


Influence Mechanism of Carbon transport and sequestration with carbon source addition in purple soil slope farmland under Natural Rainfall
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Municipal and Environmental Engineering,Hebei University of Architecture;2.Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]紫色土土壤退化形势严峻,水体流失严重,土壤增碳固碳困难,为探究碳源添加对紫色土坡耕地碳固存的影响。[方法]以四川紫色土坡耕地为对象,在10°紫色土坡耕地设置6种处理:不施肥(CK)、化肥+秸秆还田(T1)、化肥+秸秆生物炭(T2)、化肥+牛粪(T3)、化肥+有机改土基质(T4)、化肥+生物炭牛粪菇渣堆肥(T5),每种处理重复3次。分析降雨量及不同碳源处理下径流、泥沙、碳含量的变化特征。[结果]结果表明:(1)降雨量>30mm,短时强降雨(16.1mm·h-1)可促使地表径流的产出。碳源添加可以显著(p<0.05)减少地表径流量,与CK相比,T2、T3、T5减流效益分别达到38.64%、38.61%、62.95%。不同处理产沙量呈现:T1>T4>CK>T2>T3>T5,最高较CK降低58.99%。(2)地表径流有机碳流失主要以泥沙有机碳为主,占比范围67.47~90.43%。T2、T3、T5可有效减少有机碳的迁移,较CK处理有机碳损失总量减少21.74%、19.40%、49.28%。T5处理各碳组分(可溶性有机碳(DOC)、可溶性无机碳(DIC)、可溶性总碳(DTC)、泥沙有机碳)迁移通量较CK分别减少70.88%、70.92%、37.52%、60.07%。(3)PLS-PM表明,降雨是碳迁移的主要驱动因子,降雨特征、土壤理化性质、不同碳源添加均不同程度地影响土壤有机碳固存。[结论]碳源添加(T2、T3、T5)使有机碳损失总量减少。T5处理有机碳固存量提升,T2和T3减少了地表径流各碳组分的流失,而其有机碳固存量减少。表明碳源添加可以提升碳含量,减少碳迁移,但固存量却减少,需长期实验来验证。本研究对提升紫色土土壤肥力、维持土壤碳平衡和缓解土壤碳迁移具有重要意义。

    Abstract:

    [Objective]Degradation of purple soil is critical, water loss is serious, and it is difficult to increase and sequester carbon in the soil. In order to explore the impact of carbon source addition on the carbon sequestration of purple soil farmland。[Methods]Purple soil slope cropland in Sichuan Province was selected as the study. Six treatments were set up on 10° purple soil slopes: no fertilization (CK), fertilizer + straw returning (T1), fertilizer + straw biochar (T2), fertilizer + cow dung (T3), fertilizer + organic soil matrix (T4), fertilizer + biochar cow dung and mushroom slag compost (T5), each treatment was repeated 3 times. Analyze the change characteristics of runoff, sediment and carbon content under rainfall and different carbon sources.[Results]The results showed that (1) rainfall over 30 mm and short-term heavy rainfall (16.1 mm·h-1) could lead to surface runoff. The addition of carbon sources notably decreased surface runoff. In comparison with the CK , the flow reduction benefits of T2, T3, and T5 reached 38.64%, 38.61%, and 62.95%, respectively. The sediment erosion in different treatments was observed to follow the order: T1>T4>CK>T2>T3>T5, with the highest reduction of 58.99% compared to the CK . (2) The loss of organic carbon through surface runoff was primarily attributed to sediment organic carbon, which accounted for 67.47~90.43% of the total organic carbon loss. Treatments T2, T3, and T5 were effective in reducing the migration of organic carbon, resulting in a total organic carbon loss reduction of 21.74%, 19.40%, and 49.28%, respectively, compared to the CK treatment. Furthermore, the carbon fractions of T5 treatment, including dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), dissolved total carbon (DTC), and sediment organic carbon, exhibited a reduction in migration fluxes by 70.88%, 70.92%, 37.52%, and 60.07%, respectively, compared to the CK treatment. (3) PLS-PM showed that the C sequestration of soil organic carbon was influenced to varying degrees by rainfall characteristics, soil physicochemical properties, and the addition of different carbon sources.[Conclusion]Carbon sources (T2, T3, T5) reduces the total amount of organic carbon loss. T5 processing organic carbon sequestration stock increases, T2 and T3 reduce the loss of each carbon component of surface runoff, while its organic carbon sequestration stock decreases. It shows that the addition of carbon source can increase the carbon content and reduce the carbon migration, but that the solid stock is reduced, which needs to be verified by long-term experiments. This study holds significant importance in enhancing the fertility of purple soil, maintaining soil carbon balance, and reducing soil carbon loss.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-02
  • 最后修改日期:2024-10-03
  • 录用日期:2024-10-08
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-01-09
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码