喀斯特高原石漠化区露石岩-土界面与非岩-土界面土壤入渗特性差异
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

许胜兵(1996-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事喀斯特土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:xsbgzuwx@126.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S715.3

基金项目:

贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合基础[2020]1Y176);国家自然科学基金项目(42007067);贵州省普通高等学校青年科技人才成长项目(黔教合KY字[2021]082);贵州省高层次创新型千层次人才项目;贵州省一流学科建设项目(GNYL[2017]007);贵州大学培育项目(贵大培育[2019]36号)


Differences of Soil Infiltration Characteristics Between Exposed Rock-soil Interface and Non-rock-soil Interface in Rocky Desertification Area of Karst Plateau
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为揭示喀斯特石漠化区露石岩—土界面与非岩—土界面土壤渗透特性差异,通过环刀法探究岩—土界面与非岩—土界面土壤入渗特征及入渗模型适应性。结果表明:(1)岩—土界面0—10 cm土层和10—20 cm土层土壤容重大于非岩—土界面,土壤总孔隙度小于非岩—土界面。岩—土界面含水率和毛管孔隙度总体上大于非岩—土界面,非毛管孔隙度、黏粒和排水能力总体上小于非岩—土界面。(2)岩—土界面土壤的入渗能力总体上小于非岩—土界面,其初始入渗速率、平均入渗率、稳定入渗率小于非岩—土界面(平直形除外)。(3)3种形状岩—土界面0—10 cm土层和10—20 cm土层土壤的初始入渗速率、平均入渗率和稳定入渗率均表现为平直形>外凸形>内凹形。非岩—土界面土壤入渗与岩—土界面具有相似性,主要由土壤容重和总孔隙度共同决定。(4) Horton模型对岩—土界面与非岩—土界面土壤入渗的拟合效果优于Kostiakov模型和Philip模型,能更好地模拟喀斯特地区复杂情况下土壤的入渗特征。研究以期为深入认识喀斯特地区水分入渗及水土流失提供新的研究思路与科学理论支撑。

    Abstract:

    In order to reveal the difference of soil infiltration characteristics between exposed rock-soil interface and non-rock-soil interface in karst rocky desertification area, the ring knife method was used to explore the soil infiltration characteristics of rock-soil interface and non-rock-soil interface, as well as the adaptability of infiltration model. The results showed that: (1) The bulk density of 0—10 cm soil layer and 10—20 cm soil layer soil at rock-soil interface was higher than that at non-rock-soil interface, while the total soil porosity was lower than that at non-rock-soil interface. The water content and capillary porosity of rock-soil interface was generally greater than that of non-rock-soil interface, while non-capillary porosity, clay particles and drainage capacity was generally less than that of non-rock-soil interface. (2) The infiltration capacity of rock-soil interface was generally less than that of non-rock-soil interface, and the initial infiltration rate, average infiltration rate and stable infiltration rate at rock-soil interface was lower than that at non-rock-soil interface (except flat). (3) The initial infiltration rate, average infiltration rate and stable infiltration rate of the 0—10 cm soil layer and 10—20 cm soil layer of the three shapes at rock-soil interface followed the order of flat > convex > concave. The infiltration at non-rock-soil interface was similar to that at rock-soil interface, which was mainly determined by soil bulk density and total porosity. (4) The fitting effects of Horton model on soil infiltration at rock-soil interface and non-rock-soil interface were better than Kostiakov model and Philip model, and it could better simulate soil infiltration characteristics under complex conditions in karst areas. This study was expected to provide new research ideas and scientific theoretical support for the in-depth understanding of water infiltration and soil erosion in karst areas.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

许胜兵, 彭旭东, 戴全厚, 刘婷婷, 岑龙沛.喀斯特高原石漠化区露石岩-土界面与非岩-土界面土壤入渗特性差异[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(5):136~143

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-25
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-10-11
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码