工程扰动对黄土抗蚀性与抗冲性的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

王龙(1995-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤水分运移与生态修复研究。E-mail:wanglong18@mails.ucas.ac.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S157.1

基金项目:

甘肃省科学院应用研究与开发项目(2019-JK-07);国家自然科学基金项目(41977426,41771322)


Influence of Engineering Disturbance on Soil Anti-Erodibility and Anti-Scourability of Loess
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为研究工程扰动对黄土抗蚀性和抗冲性的影响,以兰州市城关区北山为研究区,选取1年填方样地(T1a)、5年填方样地(T5a)、7年挖方样地(W7a)和天然草地(C)4个样地采集原状土样,在室内使用干筛—湿筛法测定土壤团聚体相关指标研究土壤抗蚀性,用抗冲槽研究土壤抗冲性,并分析了影响土壤抗蚀性和抗冲性的因素。结果表明,各样地表层(0—10 cm)土壤水稳性团聚体的平均质量直径(MWDw)和>0.25 mm团聚体占比(wδ>0.25)w)表现为C>W7a>T5a>T1a,土壤团聚体破坏率(PAD)表现为T1a>T5a>W7a>C,挖填方样地表层土壤水稳性团聚体颗粒分形维数(Dw)均值为2.82,C样地Dw为2.74,C样地表层土壤的抗蚀性显著强于挖填方样地;T5a和W7a样地中下层土壤(10—20,20—30 cm)MWDwwδ>0.25)w显著低于表层土壤;各样地表层土壤抗冲系数为W7a>C>T5a>T1a,W7a和C样地的值较为接近。影响土壤抗蚀性与抗冲性的主要因素有土壤电导率、有机质和根系,土壤生物结皮也会影响土壤抗冲性。这些影响因素与挖填方样地搁置年限密切相关,即随着挖填方样地搁置年限增长,这些因素逐渐发生变化,有益于受扰动土壤MWDwwδ>0.25)w的增加以及PAD的降低,其表层土壤的冲刷强度慢慢接近草地。工程扰动显著降低黄土的抗蚀性和抗冲性,应当做好必要的水土保持措施以降低土壤侵蚀风险。

    Abstract:

    In order to study the influence of engineering disturbance on the soil anti-erodibility and anti-scourability of loess, taking Beishan, Chengguan District, Lanzhou City as the study area, the undisturbed soils were sampled from four plots: 1-year filled plot (T1a), 5-year filled plot (T5a), 7-year dug plot (W7a) and natural grassland plot (C). In the laboratory, the dry-wet sieve method was used to determine the soil aggregate related indicators to study the soil anti-erodibility, and the anti-scour trough was used to study the soil anti-scourability, and the factors affecting the soil anti-erodibility and anti-scourability were analyzed. The results showed that the mean weight diameter of soil water-stable aggregates (MWDw) and the proportion of aggregates>0.25 mm (w(δ>0.25)w) of the surface layer (0—10 cm) of each sample surface showed C>W7a>T5a>T1a. The soil percentage of aggregates destruction (PAD) showed T1a>T5a>W7a>C. The average of soil water stable aggregates fractal dimension (Dw) in the surface layer of dug and filled plots was 2.82, the Dw of C plot was 2.74. The anti-erodibility of the surface layer soil of the C was significantly stronger than those of the dug and filled sites. The MWDw and w(δ>0.25)w of the middle and lower soil (10—20 cm and 20—30 cm) of the T5a and W7a plots were significantly lower than those of the surface layer soil. The surface soil anti-erosion coefficients of each sample showed W7a>C>T5a>T1a, and the values of W7a and C sample plots were relatively close. Soil electrical conductivity, organic matter and root system were the main factors affecting soil anti-erodibility and soil anti-scourability. In addition, soil biological crusts could also affect soil anti-scourability. These factors are closely related to the shelving years of dug and filled plots. This means, these factors gradually change as the shelving time of dug and filled plots increases, which is beneficial to the increase of MWDw and w(δ>0.25)w,and the decrease of PAD of disturbed soil, and the scouring intensity of surface soil is close to that of natural grassland. Engineering disturbance would significantly reduce the soil anti-erodibility and soil anti-scourability of loess, and necessary water and soil conservation measures should be taken to reduce the risk of soil erosion.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王龙, 张连科, 马伊明, 杜峰, 徐学选.工程扰动对黄土抗蚀性与抗冲性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):14~20,26

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-13
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-07-20
  • 出版日期: