基于WEPP的砒砂岩坡面复合侵蚀治理生态水文效应评价
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

胡剑汝(1994-),女,云南保山人,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与生态水文效应评价研究。E-mail:542241205@qq.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S157;TU45

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目"砒砂岩区复合土壤侵蚀综合治理技术"(2017YFC0504503)


Evaluation of Eco-hydrological Effect of Composite Erosion Control of Pisha Sandstone Slope Based on WEPP Model
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于2014—2016年二老虎沟小流域坡面径流小区的7场野外降雨下径流泥沙监测数据,在砒砂岩区表土(0—20 cm)条件下,通过累积误差法率定模型土壤参数;同时采用模型有效性系数(ME)和决定系数(R2)对模型有效性进行验证,并利用WEPP模型对不同侵蚀治理措施坡面径流泥沙情况进行了模拟预测,对其减流减沙生态水文效应进行了比较分析。结果表明:(1)当模型有效水力传导系数为4.73 mm/h、临界剪切力为1 Pa和细沟土壤可蚀性为0.01 s/m时,模型模拟效果最佳。(2) WEPP模型模拟无措施(裸地)小区径流量和侵蚀量的R2分别为0.722 3和0.702 5,ME分别为0.616 0和0.616 7,WEPP模型模拟措施(草地)小区径流量和侵蚀量的R2分别为0.711 6和0.844 7,ME分别为0.674 1和0.690 3;措施小区的模型效果比无措施小区的模拟效果好。(3)不同降雨类型下,情景a (阳坡低盖度草本)、情景b (阳坡低盖度灌丛)、情景c (阳坡中盖度灌丛)、情景d (阴坡灌木林)、情景e (阴坡高盖度灌丛)、情景f (阴坡低盖度灌丛)的植物措施减流效应为13.04%~91.28%,减沙效应为44.46%~99.98%。总体来看,不同情景的减流减沙效应为情景d > 情景e > 情景c > 情景f > 情景b > 情景a。

    Abstract:

    Based on the field monitoring data of runoff plot in erhugou small watershed from 2014 to 2016, under the condition of the surface soil (0-20 cm) in the pisha sandstone area, the soil parameters of the model were calibrated by the cumulative error method; at the same time, the model validity coefficient (ME) and the decision coefficient (R2) were used to verify the model validity, and WEPP model was used to simulate the runoff and sediment conditions of different erosion control measures. The ecohydrological effects of runoff and sediment reduction were compared and analyzed. The results showed that:(1) When the effective hydraulic conductivity, critical shear force, and erodibility of rill soil are 4.73 mm/h, 1 Pa and 0.01 m/s respectively, the simulation effect of the model is the best. (2) The R2 and ME of WEPP model to simulate runoff and erosion of no measure (bare land) plot were 0.722 3 and 0.616 0, 0.702 5 and 0.616 7 respectively, and the runoff and erosion of WEPP model to simulate measure (grassland) plot were were 0.711 6 and 0.674 1, 0.844 7 and 0.690 3, respectively, and the simulation effect of the model with measures was better than that without measures. (3) Under different rainfall types, the effects of scenario a (herbage with low coverage on sunny slope), scenario b (shrub with low coverage on sunny slope), scenario c (shrub with medium coverage on sunny slope), scenario d (shrub with high coverage on cloudy slope), scenario e (shrub with high coverage on cloudy slope), and scenario f (shrub with low coverage on cloudy slope) on runoff reduction were 13.04%~91.28%, and the effects of sediment reduction were 44.46%~99.98%. In general, the effects of different scenarios were:scenario d > scenario e > scenario c > scenario f > scenario b > scenario a.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

胡剑汝, 饶良懿, 申震洲.基于WEPP的砒砂岩坡面复合侵蚀治理生态水文效应评价[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(2):123~129,238

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-13
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-04-13
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码